Fisking W
I hate to kick a guy while he's down, but I just came acroos this letter he offered up last year on World Intellectual Property Day. w00t!
This is par for the course: the world is "increasingly competitive" (?) and more enforcement, in the name of "protecting" the poor plebeians, is just what the doctor ordered. No sense of balance.
Ye olde "stealing" metaphor, coming as usual from a sloppy conflation of copyright, trademark, and patent law into the term "intellectual property". Mr. B is, of course, using the warm fuzzy feelings we associate with property to hide a fact that would otherwise be painfully obvious:
Unauthoried copying is not theft. Technically, I believe it can be called "criminal conversion" (like when you mooch a person's unsecured WiFi and heshe doesn't notice).
'Course a lot of people will say "whatever, you're splitting hairs". The problem is that if you start allowing this sloppy use of legal terms (by presidents!), you get a regime in which the following BS is occasionally taken seriously:
No copying is taking place here -- Mr. K is talking about using a PVR. Not only is there "theft" going on but apparently breach of contract! Geez. Better get a lawyer before you turn that thing on.
As you can see, I got bored with the prez 'cause this stuff is much funnier. I actually do not have any contract with Mr. Kellner or his client -- I do not and will not subscribe to cable because the quality of product is terrible. Hell, for all I know it actually does have a clause saying that you will watch all the ads. I suspect it does not actually discuss the bathroom exception, but if it does *please link it -- sounds like a great read.
Hell, two can play at this game. From now on I'm going to refer to copyright overreaching as "terrorism". Maybe then I can persuade W to get on board.
In today's increasingly competitive world, improved enforcement of intellectual property rights is critical to establishing free and fair trade among nations and to protecting consumers and hardworking innovators
This is par for the course: the world is "increasingly competitive" (?) and more enforcement, in the name of "protecting" the poor plebeians, is just what the doctor ordered. No sense of balance.
I was also pleased to sign the Stop Counterfeiting in Manufactured Goods Act. This important piece of legislation will help protect Americans from those who sell illegal products and steal intellectual property
Ye olde "stealing" metaphor, coming as usual from a sloppy conflation of copyright, trademark, and patent law into the term "intellectual property". Mr. B is, of course, using the warm fuzzy feelings we associate with property to hide a fact that would otherwise be painfully obvious:
Unauthoried copying is not theft. Technically, I believe it can be called "criminal conversion" (like when you mooch a person's unsecured WiFi and heshe doesn't notice).
'Course a lot of people will say "whatever, you're splitting hairs". The problem is that if you start allowing this sloppy use of legal terms (by presidents!), you get a regime in which the following BS is occasionally taken seriously:
It's theft. Your contract with the network when you get the show is you're going to watch the spots. Otherwise you couldn't get the show on an ad-supported basis. Any time you skip a commercial or watch the button you're actually stealing the programming. (Src)
No copying is taking place here -- Mr. K is talking about using a PVR. Not only is there "theft" going on but apparently breach of contract! Geez. Better get a lawyer before you turn that thing on.
CW: What if you have to go to the bathroom or get up to get a Coke?
JK: I guess there's a certain amount of tolerance for going to the bathroom.
As you can see, I got bored with the prez 'cause this stuff is much funnier. I actually do not have any contract with Mr. Kellner or his client -- I do not and will not subscribe to cable because the quality of product is terrible. Hell, for all I know it actually does have a clause saying that you will watch all the ads. I suspect it does not actually discuss the bathroom exception, but if it does *please link it -- sounds like a great read.
Hell, two can play at this game. From now on I'm going to refer to copyright overreaching as "terrorism". Maybe then I can persuade W to get on board.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home